christopher's lives (v5.3)

Friday, May 8th, 2009 at 12:28 pm

Movies I watched – April 2009

    Didn’t get a lot of movie time this past month, but, here’s some thoughts on what we did get to see, in reverse chronological order.
    
    
Battlestar Galactica
    I just wanted to make a few comments on this before I get into the actual movies. Terra and I have watched the pilot mini-series and the first four episodes in this last couple weeks and I love it so far. I grew up on sci-fi, but, I think sci-fi really changed in the early 90s or so. I watched the first season of ST:TNG back in the day but then lost interest in Trek altogether – especially when the god-awful fifth movie came out (followed by the god-awful sixth and god-awful seventh, etc.). But I still love the first four films and I can sit through most of the old episodes. So, as they say, “Kirk is my captain”. And I have tried various sci-fi stuff over the years and just have seen very little that is any good, especially on tv. Most sci-fi seems to have turned into action, popcorn stuff in a future/tech setting, but, little actual thoughtful stuff. Sci-fi is supposed to be about IDEAS. Good science fiction leaves you thinking and discussing long after you have seen it. 1954’s The Day The Earth Stood Still is a good example, 1982’s Blade Runner is one of my favorites, and a good recent example would be 1999’s The Matrix. Who am I to define what sci-fi is? Good question. So, perhaps all I am doing is referring to a sub-genre.
    Anyway, what I have seen of BSG so far is great sci-fi; sci-fi as I understand great sci-fi to be. And just great in general. Great premise, great stories, great characters. And I really love the sound design. I am really looking forward to seeing more and I already have so many questions.
    
    
Primer
    Speaking of great sci-fi…
    I watched this in bed on my PSP. This is my fourth time or so to do this – I still haven’t watched it any other way. I love love love this movie. I love the small scale, just a couple of guys with little lives. And, made for $7,000, this truly is a ‘garage movie’. And sci-fi of concepts, no special effects needed. I also love the way it is filmed and acted – I always feel like I am just looking in, the acting is so natural I forget I am watching performances.
    This is on my mental list of greatest science fiction films ever made. And such a unique twist on the whole time travel concept.
    
    
Vanilla Sky
    Wow, um, what to say. I remember loving this movie – watched it several times with my wife and liked it enough to listen to the commentary a couple times. And, Terra had seen it and has been wanting to see it again.
    Well, we didn’t really like it. Not sure why. Though, this was the second in a Cameron Crowe double feature. We watched Almost Famous, followed by this. Maybe it was too late at night to appreciate, maybe it couldn’t measure up to Almost Famous. Dunno’. Anyway, something just didn’t click. We both felt it took too long to tell the story. Just sitting there waiting for the surprise ending and not really getting much else from it. I have no idea how this happened.
    But, I want to give it another chance some time.
    
    
Almost Famous
    I didn’t know if Terra would like this one or not, so, I went easy on her and started off with the much shorter theatrical cut.
    I knew I loved this movie but I had forgotten how much. This easily is in my top twenty of all time and I have really been thinking it deserves top ten placement.
    This is real comfort movie material here. And it is all about the people. I want to spend more time with these people. (Maybe, like is said of the main character, they make me feel cool?) I was absolutely smitten with this film every moment it was on and I converted the director’s cut plus commentary and put it on my PSP the very next day so I can spend some real quality, personal time with it. Speaking of the commentary – this film has the best. commentary. ever. At least, if you love the film.
    I have seen it many times and, again, I remember loving it, but, anytime I have considered watching it in the last year or so, I kept finding myself trying to remember WHY I loved it and couldn’t really think of anything. Like, maybe it was just the sort of thing I was into back then. I finally chose it one night because Terra loves Frances McDormand and I thought she’d love her in this one. And I expected to like it, but, I was just totally carried along the whole time.
    I have that little list of ten movies I can’t live without on my sidebar, and I may very well bump one to add this one to the list.

     By the way, see also August Rush for a movie about the love of music.
    
    
JFK
    This was the director’s cut we watched and boy was I sorry. She had never seen this film and even the theatrical cut is just way too long. But, she loves mysteries and didn’t know much about the whole Kennedy assassination thing and I grew up in the Dallas area, so, I’ve heard it all. The problem is that Oliver Stone always takes forever to tell a story. I can’t even say it is always worth the journey. I think Natural Born Killers is and this one probably is. Obviously, you come to this one for the last forty minutes and have to sit through the first (what feels like) five hours to get to the finale.
    Yes, this is a great film, but I would almost condone invasive studio control over a director’s work in this case :P
    
    
Iron Man
    Meh.
    I am biased, I don’t like action movies. Any movie that you can sum up to someone in terms of “this happened then that happened then this happened” etc. is an action flick. I used to have a practice that, whenever I watched a genre film in a genre I was not fond of, I would make it a double feature so I could compare them to each other rather than compare one to a “real movie”. But, even if I had done that and watched this with, say, one of the new Batman movies, Batman would win hands down.
    Tony Stark was an interesting character and was well-acted, but, all that did was point out how everyone else in the movie is a cardboard cut-out. And, the plot was totally color by numbers. You knew the guy in the cave was going to be dead, you knew Jeff Bridges was going to become the bad guy, this is all typical comic book stuff. Then it was combined with typical popcorn flick stuff – action sequences and pratfall humor, etc..
    A genre film is always predictable but tries to tell the story this time around with enough stylistic and interpretive differences to try to be a replacement for the previous versions and perhaps this succeeds somewhat for the superhero movie – I don’t know the genre very well. But that doesn’t make it a good film – it will be forgotten in fifty years, it leaves no legacy, it will not endure. I read Ebert’s review and just couldn’t believe his high praise for it and he even called it one of the best of the year.
    There are much better films out there that tell a story of a bad man becoming a good man and making his wrongs right and no special effects or suspension of disbelief are required. And they WILL endure, so, if you haven’t seen them, that’s ok, they’ll still be around when you are ready.
    
    
L.A. Story
    There was a day that Terra and I wanted to have a “light movie day”. Nothing deep, nothing to explain or ponder, just entertainment.
    Heh, um, I had a REAL problem finding many like that in my collection. Just to be clear, remember I have a huge LaserDisc collection of all kinds of movies, but most of them are in storage and my DVDs and Blu-Rays are only movies I love. There are plenty of “light” movies in my LD collection.
    Anyway, I love L.A. Story. It is a very romantic love story. But, there is so much more to it – it fits into my category of ‘movies that can’t figure out what they wanted to be’. But, it is another movie I say “watch it until you don’t laugh at the jokes anymore”. Sure, it works great as a comedy (see also American Psycho for a satirical view of L.A. life) but, if you want to get the full impact of the fantasy romantic side of it, watch it until that’s all you see.
    On that note, though, it sort of failed us as a “light” movie because there were more than a few moments that I couldn’t help but pause and call Terra’s attention to something subtle. In that way, Clueless is another ’see also’ for this one. I know so many teens that love Clueless and don’t seem to see that they are being made fun of. It works so well on the surface level that it is easy to miss the underlying messages.
    There is a scene or two in L.A. Story that seem to be only there so someone could get a cameo (I’m looking at you, Rick-Moranis-as-a-gravedigger scene!), but, there are a couple scenes that are so magical. For instance, when they go for a walk and feel young again, not middle-aged and hopeless, thinking love can never find them again – they now feel so much hope, like they have their whole lives ahead of them all over again. At least, that’s my interpretation of that scene. And I still get teary when she is on the plane to leave and I always hear his words spoken earlier about what he would do if he could to stop her from leaving.
    (I have on my to-do list to make a blog post about movies that make me cry. But not today.)
    
    
Fletch
    This is just a comfort film. I have seen it more times than I can count since I was a kid. I always love Chevy Chase’s shtick. The story is ok, the acting, whatever – none of it is anything special but I love Chevy Chase in pretty much anything. I can sit through a bad movie if it has Chevy Chase in it and this is probably my favorite.
    BTW, this was the first in our “light movie day”, followed by L.A. Story.
    
    
The Matrix
    One of the greatest science fiction films ever made and I stand by that ten years after seeing it the first time. And an action move I actually like – the chase scene at the beginning is so exhilarating and a big reason why I got the game Mirror’s Edge – just so I could live something similar. And, I love the visual style of it – I wish I had a poster of the group shot of them behind the phone, the first time they all go into the Matrix.
    My main complaints with this one are as an action film, oddly enough. The fight scenes should have been done by real martial artists. Watch an old Jackie Chan film – these guys move like old men. In fact, Jackie Chan at his age now, moves faster than these young actors.
    But, this one is full of great science fiction, semi-cyberpunk moments and ideas.
    Oh, I almost forgot, this was the new Blu-ray release we watched and, um, WOW! IT looks absolutely stunning.
    
    Too bad they never made any sequels :P
    
    
So, that brings this post to this month’s bottom line:
    
Was Ready To Re-Watch It As Soon As It Was Over: Almost Famous
Would Rather Re-Watch Any Other Film In This List Than This One: JFK

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 at 10:42 am

march movies

i have had this urge lately to blog the movies i watch and do it once a month – not to give detailed reviews or anything, just to log them… since i had this idea late, i’ll start with the movies i watched in march in reverse chronological order…

Magnolia
this may very well be my favorite movie i have ever seen… it is so much more than a film – it is an emotional experience…
i have loved it for years, but, it became even more powerful after being at my father’s side as he suffered a long, horrible death… there are quite a few little details in the film that let me know that pt anderson has lived through watching someone die… what i mean is, there are things i have only seen twice – in this movie and with my father…
i could go on for hours about this film, but i won’t here – i want this to be a concise recap of the month…

Breakfast At Tiffany’s
meh… i liked the character of holly and the performance by audrey hepburn, but, meh…

Ed Wood
probably the only tim burton film i genuinely like and i REALLY like it… not a great film – this one is more personal… what i relate to the most is the cast of weirdos around him – it reminds me of certain times in my own life… so, i wouldn’t defend it as a truly good film or try to get anyone else to watch it – it’s one i would keep on my psp and watch alone when i need to be with friends :P

The Terminal
speaking of my psp, i had never seen this one and watched it in bed one night on my psp and really really liked it… sure, there are some problems with it – it’s another i wouldn’t defend as a great film, but, i think this will be a favorite for a long time to come…

Ringu
never saw it before – wanted to for a long time… i don’t like horror films, but, this one has influenced so much popular media, it is certainly a relevant film… glad i saw it, doubt i will watch it again…
oh, but, i still want to see the american version…

Tristan+Isolde
second time seeing this one, first time for terra… so much great about it, but so much wrong… so hard to sympathize with the characters’ plight… sure, i understand how they got in this mess, but, they should have done the right thing and therefore, i wasn’t feeling too sympathetic… i think the final third or so of this movie was MUCH better than what came before… it got very emotional for me – i was feeling everything going on…
btw, i was suspecting while watching it that this was a big summer release, heavily advertised on MTV :P i just kept thinking how much teenagers must have loved this one and how it seemed to be made for teenagers…

The Night of the Comet
The Night of the Living Dead
this was a slumber party night double feature…
night of the comet is a movie i saw countless times as a kid, so, it is indelibly ingrained in my mind… i have every moment of it memorized and know it too well to hate it… a very bad movie, but, the mall scene and the villain thereof were reason enough to watch it with someone who has never seen it…
as for night of the living dead – haven’t seen it since i was a kid and feel i didn’t miss much… but, again, it is a relevant film – starting an entire genre, so, i don’t regret seeing it…
both were a perfect choice for slumber party night…

Matrix Revolutions
i think the first in the trilogy is one of the greatest sci-fi films ever made and the other two are pretty blah… but, i keep coming back to them every few months just to give them another try… i am totally in love with the universe of the film and want to love all three films…

Delicatessen
i have loved Amelie for years and had heard good things about this one… um, it didn’t deliver… it was as strange and surreal as i expected, but, it just wasn’t that good… i know i’ll watch it again someday, though…

Matrix Reloaded
see above…

bottom line:
best i saw this month i had never seen before: The Terminal
worst i saw this month i had never seen before: probably Ringu

since i didn’t do posts for february or january and i don’t feel like going back right now, i’ll give the bottom lines for those months, without comments… maybe i’ll come back and do full posts another time…

february bottom line:
best: August Rush
worst: What Lies Beneath
even better the second time: The Dark Knight
amazing performance in a blah movie: tie between Capote and Being There
also loved: Wit, Primer, Rushmore
still great after all these years: Barefoot in the Park, Mr. Hobbs Takes A Vacation, Rear Window

january bottom line:
best i had never seen: The Darjeeling Limited
best i saw all month: Lost In Translation
worst: The Haunting
awesome beginning, all downhill from there: The Happening
most surprising disappointment: Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (i used to LOVE this one and was so sorry i chose it for our slumber party night – we were bored!)
much much much better than i remembered: The Incredibles

ok, let’s do this again next month :)

Monday, February 23rd, 2009 at 3:56 am

Follow the music… August Rush

i just watched it for the first time and wanted to get some thoughts down while the emotional impression is still fresh… i have not read a word about this film, nor did i even know what it was about…

(btw, i’m typing this up on my phone, which has no cut/paste… not the best way to write, but it’ll have to do and if you continue to read, you’ll have to be ready for some stream-of-consciousness disorganization…)

i watched this on the recommendation a few months ago of Tara, a good friend whose opinion when it comes to emotional movies i very much trust… she was right about the power of The Notebook so when she said similar things about August Rush, i knew she would be right… and, of course, insisted she not tell me a single thing about it – i just took her word for it

but, as i watched, i was doubting my trust in her… it took awhile for me to get sucked in… the film is dreamy – not surreal, but fantasy to be sure and not a strictly straightforward narrative and i was a little confused initially… but, after awhile, i began to see it as more like a dream i was having and stopped trying to keep the story straight and just let it move me – carry me…

it is a story of a miracle…
i think that says it best – a miracle happens and this is the telling of the events leading up to it…
what happens is an impossibility or at least a great improbability… this is a fairy tale, a fable – and any objections to what happened i might have were less important to what it meant and how it made me feel… it is a very emotional film… and the last twenty minutes or so, it just kept repeating in my mind: “follow the music follow the music”… music is the spirituality of the film – the religion of the three key characters… music is the meaning in their lives – not simply the only thing that matters to them, but the only thing that CAN matter, the only thing that is real… and each of them has someone who doesn’t have music the way they do and is trying to harness their music for their own ends… the girl’s father, the guy’s brother, and “Wizard” in the boy’s life… the characters “need music more than food” and each has someone who needs food more than music and has – or tries to have – control… only when each follows the music are they free… alive… and neither of those words describe it – their relationship to music transcends human understanding… it is The Cause, pushing their existance forward… without music, they are just humans… and when they follow the music, they can arrive at what they were meant for…

and, the movie ends on just the perfect note… the moment of nirvana – of destiny completed – and the mood was not destroyed by words… the writer/director/whoever made the very wise choice to not have anyone say anything… we already knew the facts they would tell each other, so why ruin this flawless moment? we can imagine what happens next but there isn’t even a need to imagine – when people ride off into the sunset, there is no next day, that’s why it’s a romance… their whole life has been leading up to this moment and the maker(s) of the film doesn’t ruin it – you just wake up from this beautiful dream…

i absolutely must watch this again because i’m not certain how i will feel about it a second time…
i know the kid’s performance is great, the overall pacing is pretty good, the photography is beautiful, the use of music and sound design was superb (i hope this is available in dts), but as i said, it did take me awhile to get truly sucked in… i said to terra as the credits rolled that it is a flawed masterpiece, but a masterpiece just the same…
i have been really wanting to see films by female directors after being so moved by Sophia Coppola’s Lost In Translation – knowing that a female director will convey emotion in a completely different way… and this is certainly the most unique film i have seen in years and i truly mean that…
but i wanted it to make me cry and it didn’t… i wanted it to take my breath away and i had to settle for awe… there were a lot of smiles i had in the third act as i saw it all coming together, but it was undeniably predictable… that is probably the wrong way to say it… the hopes and dreams we share with these three came true! so, no surprise is not a bad thing! but, i knew they would come true and what was amazing was the miraculous ways they did come true… it is a rare film that can make me not only suspend disbelief but put my focus purely on the emotions of the film and this accomplishes it… but i’m almost embarrassed to be so moved when i can think of some of the flaws…

so what i am hoping for above all else is that i will see nothing but greatness on my next viewing…

SEE ALSO:
…Searching For Bobby Fischer for more on people trying to possess someone’s gift
…A.I.:Artificial Intelligence for another character/performance like the boy

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009 at 3:11 am

a few thoughts on Being There

this is one of many movies that, as a self-professed film snob, it is pretty much unforgivable that i have never seen it…

peter sellers was absolutely amazing – he played the role perfectly every moment, too much would have made us feel he was something less than a person, too little and he would have come across as just disinterested… i poked around a bit at the various things that have been said over the last thirty years about his performance and it has been well-covered, so, i’ll skip right to the stuff i can’t forgive…

but, before i go on, let me say that i am keeping this film and will surely view it again – but pretty much only for his performance…

my objections are simple to state – i just didn’t believe it… i didn’t buy it that these people didn’t catch on… is there a reason that the director wanted me to catch on to? maybe, but, if so, it is buried deeper than i was able to look…
this movie kept calling to mind some cartoon i saw many many years ago… somehow, a dog ends up like president of a company or something… i have scoured the net, trying to find info on this cartoon, hoping to embed/link it here, but i just remember too little… anyway, he is in some kind of power – we are talking probably nearly 20 years ago i saw it, but it was something like he was in the right place at the right time, maybe accidentally got human clothes on him, but one way or another, they made him president, all his growls and barks and grunts somehow twisted by them into what they thought they heard or wanted to hear or whatever… i remember two details clearly – the first is that they ask his name and he growls something that sounds like “rawelf gawagrrr” and they ‘repeat’ back Ralph Gallagher… and the last is when something happens that everyone suddenly figures out his true nature and someone shouting “HE’S A DOG!”… the whole incident is carried along by this device of them misunderstanding what to us are clearly dog noises as mumbled speech and we are laughing at them for not noticing the obvious fact that he is a dog…
well, in this movie we have the choked “Chance, the gardener” becoming “Chauncey Gardiner” and did the doctor figure it out at the end? seems so… but, there certainly was the attempts at being a whistleblower – not quite a “HE’S A GARDENER!”, but, i just couldn’t get the similarities off my mind… and i saw a cast of fools all focused on a very endearing character who who would have been much better off in a better written movie…

so, i’m sort of saying that it just kept coming across the same way… like it was intending to be only a comedy… which is a shame, because the first half hour or so, i was totally hooked in… i guess it was when he tried to change the channel on the would-be muggers that i started being concerned…
which, by the way, i have been thinking… so, he watched tv for all those years but didn’t learn how to use a phone? or that you can’t change the channel on real life?
ok, so, maybe that means, in his deficiency, he saw it for years but never internalized it… like it was a meaningless blur… he detailed to the two in the beginning his room and bathroom – down to the details of his tub, his toilet, his sink, and showed them his garden and perhaps that was all that was really real to him? the rest was something unreal and so he had no point of reference even with all that input? ok, sure, i could see that… of course, he had tears in his eyes in one of the last scenes… and i’m not going to be too quick to jump to any “well, see, he is now becoming aware of the world” because if he had that ability, one would think he would have clicked into something many years earlier, even if it was only a response to something on tv…

hmm…
i just don’t know…
then, of course, the very last thing that happened and i don’t even have much in the way of theories yet… i’d like to read around what others have said over the years…
but, since i had a hard time recognizing a pattern pointing to any kind of other meaning, i fear it meant nothing coherent at all…

i can’t help but think about the meaning of it all, but, i’m not certain that the director deserves for me to think about it… there was so much in there that just seemed to be no deeper than some comic effect… like the bedroom scene – you know, he “likes to watch”… i can’t come up with any reason why that was important – i think it was just meant to be funny… and i kept feeling that way about many other scenes… trying to find some reason to look for meaning and just not finding one…

i will go so far as to say that i think if peter sellers had not played this role, this would be a completely forgettable movie… i know that’s the case for me anyway…
say whatever about who or what he was, why he was or why he was the way he was, what it all means, or whatever, i don’t see that it will change my mind that WHAT HAPPENED just is not believable and i find it very hard to be moved by something i cannot believe…

ok, i am not gonna go back and edit this at all or even re-read it… i keep telling myself that i should force out a couple paragraphs every time i watch a movie and i have to start somewhere and if i go back and read it, i will change things and then decide it was a bad idea to even post – best to wait for a movie i can write something meaningful about or i will add three more paragraphs that are equally disjointed and that will only make it worse, so, i’m just gonna hit that publish button…
(i’m much fonder of this post…)

oh, i have had this “see also” thing going for years when i watch a movie, so….

see also: Meet Joe Black

Monday, September 15th, 2008 at 10:38 am

i’m dying to see this movie! so i have no idea what it’s about…

it’s not as odd as it sounds…
there are a few movie directors i really trust… and a handful of people whose taste in movies i trust…

so, let’s say my friend jennifer tells me i absolutely must see The Unbearable Lightness of Being or Pieces of April or Garden State… ok, i trust her taste – she has good taste… she knows my taste – she loves Silence of the Lambs and i don’t, i love American Beauty and she doesn’t… she knows me well enough to be pretty accurate about what i will like and, if she says i will love some film, i trust her…
AND SINCE I TRUST HER, I DON’T WANT TO KNOW A THING…
just give me the title, i don’t want to know what it is about, i want to go in completely clear minded… i don’t even want to know if it is a comedy, romance, western, nothin’, i trust you – just give me the title…

and there are some directors that i have seen enough of their work to know they do good, pretty much every time… so, i don’t want to know a thing…
Darren Aronofsky, PT Anderson, the Coen brothers are three great mainstream examples… i have pretty much loved everything they have done, so, when i know there is a new film coming, man… i spend month avoiding reviews, dodging trailers, steering clear of conversations, etc…. it is really hard sometimes…
of course, within a year, all three let me down… The Fountain, There Will Be Blood, and No Country For Old Men really left me scratching my head… they all deserve more viewings – i never make up my mind about a well-made film after only one viewing, but, i unreservedly love Aronofsky’s previous two films, and only PT Anderson’s Hard Eight was less than breathtaking – his others were nearly perfect, and while i would not say the Coens acheive perfection on a regular basis, i always like their films much more on a first viewing than i did NCFOM…
i will add that Pixar really let me down during the same time period, too, with Ratatouille… sure, it was beautiful, but, the hair-control thing stretched credulity to a breaking point and i thought the story as a whole was kind of insipid… weakest Pixar offering ever, i said at the time and still do… but, i still avoid any info about every Pixar film and they more than made up for it with Wall-E, which is nothing short of a masterpiece

imagine if you went to Spiderman (blech) and had no idea what the movie was about… or Wall-E or Alien or The Notebook… i didn’t know anything about From Dusk ’til Dawn when i first saw it and nothing could have prepared me for the last half :P

annnnyway, there are so many films/movies out there that i know all about, i read the review sites, i hang out at the message boards and read the discussion, i listen to the podcasts, sure… but, there are the people who i trust and i try to do the impossible with their work and know absolutely nothing, but life is too short and popular media is too pathetic to “blind buy” everything, which is why i am always keeping my eye out for directors i can trust and people whose taste i really trust…

“What the mass media offers is not popular art, but entertainment which is intended to be consumed like food, forgotten, and replaced by a new dish.” – W. H. Auden

yeah, that’s the stuff Terra and i watch on our “slumber party night” on friday nights – movies to eat junk food to… when i know i have a trusted source of exceptions to the rule, i want as pure an experience as possible…

so, i haven’t lost all trust for Aronofsky, i’ll still go see The Wrestler (and i’ve avoided finding out anything), but as i said on twitter a little bit ago, he needs to win my heart back, i’m going to be guarded after what he did on our third date… and i know i’ll like There Will Be Blood a lot more the second time… as for No Country For Old Men, some Coens films only work once you know the rules of the universe the film takes place in… and i could write a whole lot about that… i even really like The Ladykillers – the one no one else does, it seems – but, i had to see it a few times and get comfortable in the setting before the characters made much sense to me… and that could describe most of their films… they create self-contained mini-universes and, if you expect the rules of the real world to apply, the films don’t make sense… sure, all art does this to some extent, but, the Coens are one (of many) example of this idea taken to a sky-high extreme…
the thing that bugs me, i guess is that i didn’t see any juice in NCFOM… let me explain… i said i like The Ladykillers, but it took me a few viewings… while i didn’t like the film, i liked some of the moments and a lot of the dialogue… i kept putting it on while i cleaned house and such, just to catch those things enough times to really get them in my mind, since i had every expectation that i wasn’t going to see the movie again after these few viewings…
see, i was sucking the juice out of the orange and then was going to throw the orange itself away…
but, next thing i knew, i loved the movie, even though that wasn’t my intention…
so, when i watched No Country For Old Men, there was no juice to make me want to come back and suck out… i can’t think of anything i want to go back and see for fear i never will again… that being the case, it may not get the chance to grow on me like The Ladykillers and a couple of their others have…
but, i will still go see their new one, Read Before Burning…

when did this turn into a post about the Coen brothers???

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008 at 8:28 am

MY movies ratings

i was just complaining on twitter a couple weeks ago (one, two) about the netflix rating system being very restrictive…  one star = hated it, two = didn’t like, three = liked, four – really liked, and five = loved…
there are SO FEW films i want to give a five-star rating, but, according to their system, if you love it, give it five stars…  and, since you are doing this for the social aspect of finding like-minded people, it only really works if you abide by their system…

so, it got me to thinking about what i WISH i could change them to and i came up with a couple ways of looking at it:

since i have a large movie collection, one way i thought was in terms of what i might say about a film as a collector:
5 = “I own every release ever put out on LaserDisc, DVD, and Blu-Ray”
4 = “I have the Criterion DVD, is there a Blu-Ray release date yet?”
3 = “I’m waiting to come across it on sale”
2 = “I have a badly compressed file i downloaded off BitTorrent sitting on my media server, but that’s good enough”
1 = “It’s been on my NetFlix queue for months…  Near the bottom.”

and, being a home theater enthusiast and loving to watch movies with people, i was also thinking of how i might rate movies as a host, so to speak, if someone were to suggest watching a certain movie:
5 = “Great idea!  Here, have the best seat!”
4 = “Sure, it’s been too long since I saw that one”
3 = “Um, ok, that’s cool, but make sure you’ve looked at everything else first”
2 = “Hmm, well it’s in the sell stack, but, I could dig it out if you really want to see it”
1 = “WHAT???!!!  NO I DON’T OWN THAT!!  WHAT DO YOU TAKE ME FOR?!  GET THE HELL OUTTA MY HOUSE!!”

Blogged with the Flock Browser
Wednesday, April 19th, 2006 at 9:30 pm

Coens in the ‘querque!

KOAT.com – Entertainment – Coen Brothers Hold Casting Call In New Mexico
oh man, as much as i love the coens…  i have been a fan for years (i guess it all started with Fargo nearly ten years ago) and here lately it has been crazy…  i got on a kick a month or two ago where i was watching “O Brother, Where Art Thou?” like every other day, i watched “The Ladykillers” a half dozen times or so, i am going way back to “Blood Simple” any day now (i started it and then got pulled away to go play disc golf!) and my life just has not been the same since i watched “Intolerable Cruelty” three times in one weekend… (“Heinz The Baron Kraus von Espy!”)
i LOVE the Coens and have sworn that any movie time i get the next few months will be pure Coen – i have my entire collection dragged out right here by the couch…

so, to hear i could actually be witness to or even be on set for the filming of “No Country For Old Men” could not have struck at a better time… the article mentions that “Filming will take place in Albuquerque, Santa Fe and Las Vegas starting in late May.”…

i don’t get starstruck about much, but, this would do it :P

Saturday, February 11th, 2006 at 12:28 pm

the whole “Ebert on games” thing

just a few links, not a comprehensive list… i was just going to add these links to the sidebar “looking at” list, but, they are scattered and there seems to be no one gateway point to get to all of them, so, i’ll put them together here…

most people know what i have to say on this subject, but, i will point out that it is important to remember that “video games” (i prefer something more like “the current generation of popular interactive entertainment“) are still growing up and the truly great artists are yet to emerge, even if we see a few pioneers… this is much like film was in the 40s and 50s, where many movies out there were trying to capture the stage experience on film, bringing broadway shows to those who could not go to broadway shows, for example… few people yet knew what to do with this “new artform”… but, flash forward to the late 1970s and we enter the age of the blockbuster… and today, there is no shortage of cinematic visionaries…
we will someday be at this point with interactive entertainment… and, even in the present, if one hears the phrase “video game” and think of a joystick, some bleeping, shooting aliens, or maybe munching blinking dots, they are at least twenty years behind in their understanding of the subject…

and i am now going to digress and move onto the links before i start getting into lists of examples :P

04 December 2005 – Next Generation – Why Ebert Was Right

rogerebert.com :: commentary
Dec6,2005 :: Gamers fire flaming posts, e-mails…
Dec8, 2005 :: The Art of the Game 2
Dec14, 2005 :: The Game of Art 3

blog: scanners :: Jim Emerson / January 23, 2006 > Kojima: ‘Games are not art’

Sunday, October 30th, 2005 at 7:07 pm

wow, i think my inner child is wounded

‘Burque Babble: Ten Reasons I Don’t Heart the Balloon Fiesta

but, he clearly loves movies so he can’t be all bad…

and, speaking of movies, he points out that he teaches “Humanities and Film at a local middle school“… WHAT?!! how come they didn’t have that in MY day? i’d be hangin’ with Aronofsky right now!
or something…

anyway, after reading a few posts, i like his writing, i deem him interesting, i’ll add him to my “Looking At” list and keep an eye on him for awhile…

Sunday, September 26th, 2004 at 11:27 am

links – Freaks and Geeks, chronologically

The Debut

Warnings

Cancelled

2003 – The Petition

And It Actually Worked

2004 – Satisfaction

Today

More Stuff/Info/Links